Reality
The Villains from Utah on ABC’s Bachelor and Bachelorette
0
A new pattern appears to be coming out with the villains from ABC’s Bachelor and Bachelorette. They are all from Salt Lake City, Utah.
Michelle Money
This villain confused viewers and contestants alike. When she was on the show, she was kind to the other contestants, but when the other girls were not looking, she showed a whole new side. She became the comedian of the show with her wild statements and wishing for Chantal to get attacked by monkeys.
At the end of her season on “The Women Tell All” Michelle showed a different side. She seemed kind, generous, and claimed to just have been joking. She obviously did not want monkeys to come attack Chantal, but was just trying to make people laugh. Obviously not everyone has the same sense of humor.
Bentley Williams
The number one villain in Bachelorette history. Bentley came onto the show with zero feelings for Ashley and played with her heart like a dog would with a bone. Apparently he went on the show to promote his business, but that reason seems to be questioned.
Monica Spannbauer
In the new season of the Bachelor a new villain has come onto the screen. Monica Spannbauer, also from Salt Lake City, Utah has been targeted as the new villain on this season. When she first came into the house, she started to antagonize Jenna Burke. She even put poor Jenna to tears. While those watching the show can argue that Jenna took what Monica said to the extreme and could have handled herself better, others would say that Monica could have been more courteous.
A New Pattern

While not all of the villains from ABC’s most loved show come from Utah, we are definitely noticing a trend. Breaking the cycle might help the state get a better rep about it’s citizens. Hopefully Ben will not keep Monica long enough for us to see her claws come out further.
Jersey Shore’s Given a Run for their Money
0
Thought Guidos and Guidettes were confined to the coastline of New Jersey? Think again, as the cast of Jersey shore touches down in Florence to begin their fourth season on the air, the UK has created their own version of this party-going, bar-brawling, fist pumping gang, “Geordie Shore.”
This show has taken off because it’s filled with the working class version of the suntanned Italians. The cast of Geordie Shore had all previously been the meager wage earners found in call centers and discount flooring stores, while the cast of Jersey Shore were all found as club promoters, DJs, and managing fitness facilities. In a way, Geordie Shore is more relatable to the general public, American, British, or whoever.
However, the real citizens of Geordie Shore (a nickname that has been around since 1793) in Northern England aren’t too thrilled about the new reality show spin-off adopting their geographic title. They see these 20-something ripped men and brunette chicks out partying and making fools of themselves, and believe the show is giving their namesake a bad rep. According to the MSN TV Editor Lorna Cooper, “Ordinary working class people abhor both the moniker and the association.” She says that the group on the show are the type of people even the working class UK would look down on, and related them to the type of people who would be found on TV gossip shows asking, “Who’s the father”? The UK even has their own term for these types of characters, chavs. A chav is a UK-born stereotype classifying aggressive young adults from the working class who engage in anti-social behavior such as street drinking, drug abuse, and rowdiness. If this doesn’t classify the cast of Geordie Shore, then we don’t know what does.
But how do these “Chavs” compare to our “Guidos”? Jersey Shore is a show people watch to get a few laughs, watch a few chick fights, and stare at Pauly-Ds abs. Geordie Shore on the other hand, is watched by people who feel sorry for the cast and watch it to help them feel better about their own situations. We’re not saying either is better, it’s just how the different casts have panned out. There is mild moral hope for the show however, on one episode of Geordie Shore, one of the characters compared her co-stars squabble to battling political countries. “They’re like Israel and Palestine. On paper, they’re very similar,” she says. So there’s hope yet, at least they’re cultured hooligans.
Apparently to the ratings it doesn’t matter if you’re a bronzed Italian using MTV as a platform for celebrity stardom, or drinking dark-ale in the UK for a living, both shows are being watched avidly as they’ve come to be known as some outrageous and twisted form of intriguing theatrical performance.
American Idol Boots off Pia Toscano
0
Even though Simon Cowell has left the show, American Idol continues to be one of the biggest reality shows on television. On the most recent Idol episode, Pia Toscano got booted before her time. Many are starting to believe that the judges are no longer separating the great performs from the not so great. Simon may have been “mean” but he was an honest judge who told performers how it was. Many of us dislike critics, but to be honest, they do highly influence opinions of many people.
‘American Idol’: The disastrous booting of Pia Toscano reveals why critics, yes, DO matter
by Owen GleibermanAnyone who’s a critic these days has to contend with a steady anti-mainstream-media drumbeat, one that sounds something like this: Critics don’t matter! They’re out of the touch with The People! They’re snobby hacks whose opinions carry no more validity than anyone else’s! (Memo to haters: Have I left out any of your complaints?) If you accused me of being defensive on this subject, you would probably be right. It’s how I make my living, so of course I’m bound to get a little touchy about it. Yet I also think that I’m capable of setting my personal bias aside to talk about why critics, at their best, really do matter. And offhand, I can think of no better illustration of why they matter than what happened on American Idol last week, when the golden-throated songstress Pia Toscano got booted off before her time. The audience voted, presumably with their hearts, but where were the judges, the tastemakers—the critics!—when we needed them?
One can natter on about the usual voting-idiosyncrasy conspiracy theories (not enough of Pia’s fans bothered to call in for her!). Or one could argue that the vote last week was as democratic an expression of viewer wisdom as any week is on Idol, and that there was nothing outrageous about it at all. I concur, to a small degree, with the excellent case made by Ken Tucker about the Achilles’ heel of Pia as a singer: She’s so seamless in her technical and emotional perfection, her voice so controlled a vessel, that the ultimate effect of a Pia performance, no matter how good, is always a little staid. Personally, I have one additional theory about her rejection that I haven’t heard floated yet. The song that Toscano chose for her fatal week, the Tina Turner/Phil Spector classic “River Deep – Mountain High,” is an anthem of volcanic power, but it’s also one of the oddest songs in rock & roll history. It boils and roils, it crescendos, it gets all breathless and frenzied and ecstatic, but it doesn’t quite have what you could call a groove. When it first came out in 1966, public reaction to the song was so negative that Spector effectively ended his own career in response. I’ve known and loved “River Deep–Mountain High” since the mid-’70s, but it’s a track that takes a bit of getting used to. I imagine that if you were hearing it for the first time (as probably 90 percent of the Idol audience was) on the night that Pia embossed it with her usual amber perfection, it might have made you go “Hmmmm . . .”
But look, all of this rationalizing—and the spin control from Idol executive producer Nigel Lythgoe, who was clearly out to save face—misses the forest for the trees. Pia may still be learning to cut loose, and perhaps her Celine Dion-on-Xanax vibrato-machine smoothness is a touch too imperial, but even if she wasn’t meant to go the distance, she got kicked off way too early, and the more you think about it, the more obvious it is who the culprits are. As Dalton Ross, Kristen Baldwin, and Annie Barrett eloquently argued in their podcast last week, it was, more than anything else, the judges’ fault. They’ve become the equivalent of movie-ad quote whores, greeting each performance, no matter how mediocre, with the equivalent of air kisses, pelting each contestant with little bouquets of ego-stroking positivity. In their holy quest to avoid the negative, they now offer no criticism, no guidance, no sense of any standard that they’re operating from. They’re encasing each performance in a Bubble Wrap of hype.
In recent weeks, as this has really gotten out of hand, it has become depressingly obvious—at least, this is my theory—that the judges have been muzzled by the show’s producers. I say this because Randy, who at the start of the season seemed like he was becoming the new Simon (simply by remaining his old commonsensical, I-love-you-dawg-but-here’s-something-you-gotta-work-on self), grew softer and softer, and looked less and less happy about it. To give one telling example: I bow to no one in my enthusiasm for the soaring pop-gospel quavers of Jacob Lusk (whose rendition of Heart’s “Alone” is the most haunting performance so far this season), but his version of “Man in the Mirror” last week not only added nothing new to Michael Jackson’s, it was egregiously out of tune—and for any of the judges, especially the sharp-eared Randy, to fail to point that out was unforgivable. They also blew it by letting James Durbin get away with a lazy, ’60s-variety-show lounge-lizard version of “While My Guitar Gently Weeps.” I usually think that James is terrific, but he needed to be called out on that one. And had he and a few of the others been called out, Pia might still be there.
It was more than a little ironic to see the judges’ jaw-dropping, head-shaking outrage at what happened to Pia, since this was a case of the chickens coming home to roost, of the all-praise-all-the-time strategy revealed as the overly timid—and, yes, dishonest—”feel good” ideology it is. You could see the battle over that ideology turn ugly when Randy offered one of the few (mild) tidbits of criticism on last week’s show, complaining about the bumpy rhythm of the first half of Stefano’s performance, and the other two judges, especially Jennifer Lopez, castigated him, as if the very idea that he was offering words that weren’t “supportive” made him some sort of buzzkill Debbie Downer. In those few seconds, the atmosphere on the judges’ panel turned almost Stalinist. What Lopez was saying wasn’t only that she disagreed with Randy, but that his willingness to engage in criticism—any criticism—had put him on the wrong side of the show’s vibe, the wrong side of America. With the studio audience cued to agree, and to display its displeasure by booing, the whole segment took on the air of a fascist pep rally. Meanwhile, Lopez managed to gush over every single performance on rock & roll night—yet she visibly recoiled when Iggy Pop, one of the inventors of rock & roll, stuck his wild-one sneer in her face. Does J. Lo really prefer Stefano to Iggy Pop? (I’d be afraid to know the answer.)
Of course, audiences on Idol used to make similar hoots of displeasure when Simon Cowell went into one of his solo pirouettes of slice-and-dice disdain. Yet they also hung on his every word, and with good reason: For nearly a decade on Idol, Simon wasn’t just an electrifying personality and a caustically fearless judge. He was a great critic—not because he was “mean,” but because what he said was blunt and honest and incisive and fascinating. He had plenty of enthusiasm, but when he didn’t, his reasons for not liking something made you sit up and think. You might agree with him, or you might disagree, but either way, you reacted to the surgical wit of his perceptions. He had a vision of what a song should be, and his vision, more often than not, enhanced and enlarged what you heard.
Right now, the judges on Idol aren’t enhancing anything. They’re just blurring the line—between the good and the not-so-good, between the performers we like and the ones we love. Their miscalculated early save of Casey was just one more instance of their refusal to make distinctions, shrewdly and soberly, coming back to bite them. They were so busy cheerleading that they threw away their one real act of power. (Hell, a week earlier, J. Lo had wanted to use the save on Karen Rodriguez!) The grandest irony in all of this is that without content, without criticism, in what the judges elect to say, the singers aren’t raised up high. They’re subtly diminished, all mashed together into a sweetly cloying marzipan of weekly good vibes. If there’s a lesson in the booting of Pia Toscano, it’s that criticism, when it’s offered by people who know what they’re doing, isn’t evil. It’s a force that enriches, an aesthetic helping hand, a declaration of reality that helps the best artists prevail. Let’s hope that tonight the judges remember what they’re there for, that they’re willing to be critics again. Let’s hope that they start judging.
http://popwatch.ew.com/2011/04/13/american-idol-shows-why-critics-matter/
Is Reality TV too Scripted?
0Are reality shows becoming too scripted? It seems that you can’t watch a reality series without wondering how much of the “drama” is actually real or what is planted to raise TV ratings.
MTV is probably the worst instigator in this whole reality TV fever everyone has. You have shows like The Jersey Shore, The Hills, and The Real World. You have these reality competitions like American Idol, So You Think You Can Dance, and The X Factor that are based on America’s vote.
It’s not that the shows all have line for line scripts, but that the footage is ran out of order or out of context. These devices are used not only to deceive but also to tell a story quickly and entertainingly.
So why are we all so enthralled in this reality epidemic? Is it because our own lives are so boring and not so dramatic, that we have to live through the people on our television screens? I don’t think we could every pinpoint the source.
I think we need to move on from this obsession of everyone else’s lives and focus on other forms of entertainment.
